Tuesday, December 22, 2009

"Responsible" Corporate Leadership?

It is interesting to listen to President Obama (and occasionally others) talk of "corporate responsibility". He talks as if bankers should be "socially responsible" and doing their best to help our economy. Companies selling health insurance are somehow expected by many to be "responsible".

It seems very strange to me! Corporate leaders have a responsibility to maximize profits and to minimize the possibilities of having financial losses. Where helping the "better good" is not perfectly congruent with maximizing profits, why would anyone expect that a CEO or corporate board would try to help you and me?

I can easily understand the perspective of the corporate leadership. It seems less clear to me why anyone else would either be naive or talk as if they were naive. It seems obvious to me that if we wish corporations to act in certain ways there need to be laws or regulations which force them to do so.


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

That's what competition is for. Any truly open market where multiple vendors compete for your business naturally holds prices low. For God's sake that truth surrounds us from food to technology.

Healthcare is already a government controlled phony market. The players negotiate through bribing politicians for preset prices on large benefit packages.

If all regulation of the market was removed prices would drop as vendors competed for marketshare. Politicians are the real consumers of Healthcare so the corporations pitch bribes and favors to them instead of competing for the favor of the American consumer.

How you can be so gullible to think these millionaire politicians in Washington DC are going to negotiate for you a better deal than you could get for yourself from a neighborhood doctor in a real open market is truly remarkable.